首页> 外文OA文献 >Problematizing the 'Career Academic' in UK construction and engineering education : does the system want what the system gets?
【2h】

Problematizing the 'Career Academic' in UK construction and engineering education : does the system want what the system gets?

机译:对英国建筑和工程教育中的“职业学者”提出质疑:系统是否想要系统得到什么?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Within construction and engineering education, 'Career Academics' enter academia straight through the academic route with limited or, no industrial or professional experience. Career Academics are welcomed in the research focused UK Higher Education context. In line with UK government policy, despite some institutions being overtly or purely teaching led, the system's priority is to attain research funding through grants and publications, and enhance institutional reputation through world-leading research. Whilst not the sole driver, current strategy is an understandable response to government led policy. The Career Academic's professional trajectory furthers their career through administration, teaching, but principally research. This critical paper problematizes the Career Academic around three inter-related areas: their institutional appeal; their impact on the student experience, team dynamics and broader academic functions and; current strategic policy to employ them in response to government strategy. We also argue that recent UK government initiatives to focus on teaching will not address the fundamental need to employ practical academics, or 'Pracademics', for what are predominantly vocationa , practical subject areas. In addition, it could also be argued that current recruitment policy to employ Career Academics will have an adverse effect on the ambitions of the proposed Teaching Excellence Framework with substantive effects on student learning experience. We generate questions for policy makers, institutions, and those entrusted with implementation of strategy. We argue research is key, but a propensity towards the employment of Career Academics over those with industry experience is adverse to much policy focusing on the student experience. We argue for a partial rebalance in order to achieve a diverse academic skill base, and suggest questions to help achieve this.
机译:在建筑和工程教育中,“职业学者”直接通过学术途径进入学术界,而行业经验或专业经验则有限或没有。在以研究为重点的英国高等教育背景下,职业学者受到欢迎。与英国政府的政策相一致,尽管某些机构公开或纯属教学主导,但该系统的首要任务是通过拨款和出版物获得研究经费,并通过世界领先的研究来提高机构声誉。虽然不是唯一的推动力,但当前的战略是对政府主导政策的可理解的反应。职业学院的专业发展轨迹通过管理,教学,但主要是研究来促进其职业发展。这篇重要论文对职业学术界的三个相互关联的领域提出了问题:他们的机构吸引力;它们对学生体验,团队动力和更广泛的学术职能的影响;以及当前的战略政策,以根据政府战略雇用他们。我们还争辩说,英国政府最近针对教学的举措并不能满足雇用以实用为主的专业领域的实践学者或“ Praccademics”的基本需求。此外,也可以说,目前采用职业学者的招聘政策将对拟议的卓越教学框架的野心产生不利影响,对学生的学习经历产生实质性影响。我们为决策者,机构以及负责实施战略的机构提出问题。我们认为研究是关键,但相对于具有行业经验的人而言,雇用职业学者的倾向不利于许多侧重于学生经验的政策。我们主张进行部分重新平衡,以实现多元化的学术技能基础,并提出问题以帮助实现这一目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号